25.4.11

It's in your TV: Outsourced



There is very little that can really be said about Outsourced, either good or bad. In terms of plot and comedy style it’s formulaic and unimaginative. The premise of the show involves an American sales manager, Todd Dempsy (Rappaport), who due to (vague and irrelevant) situational factors is forced to move to India to work at a call centre in the business of selling American novelties. Why he does this and how come uprooting overnight and leaving his current life behind was so easy will remain a mystery to the audience. 

I considered the lack of characterisation of the protagonist to be a major flaw of the show. If the writers can’t be bothered to give the main character a backstory, or at least explain the motivations behind his actions, how (or why) is the audience supposed to understand (care) about what he does or doesn’t do? I get that this is a light comedy show but the reductive characterization is evidence of poor and lazy writing.

            To expand a bit on my previous point, the main annoyance of this show that never goes away is the main character, not the actor, but the role itself. I don’t know if Todd’s lack of personality was intentional, to be a blank slate on whom the viewer can superimpose themselves, or it was simply bad writing (I’m inclined to believe the latter), but the results is the same. The nondescript, naïve but ever-learning protagonist adds a very obnoxious element of the show; they even gave the tall, silent guy more character.
That could be overlooked if it was the show’s only shortcoming, but it isn’t. The main (only) source of comedy for the show is the constant culture clash between Todd’s American way of life and Indian culture. A basic episode can be summed up as follows: Todd does/says something ignorant and insensitive (i.e. he sees his co-workers doing something different than what he is used to, therefore it is wrong and must be corrected), everyone is outraged, Todd tries to fix things only to make matters worse, after a two minute conversation at the end of an episode years of closed minded and prejudicial upbringing is undone, Todd learns something new and everyone is happy. Then they break into song! (kidding) 

The ever-present culture difference is also emphasized by Bader’s character Charlie Davies who serves as the in-house outspoken, ignorant, and occasionally racist best friend and Tonya [no last name] the overtly sexual and uninhibited aussie who serves to illustrate the difference in female attitude and culture (I also think she serves to fill a quota on sexual innuendos and mini-skirts; not that I’m complaining). 

Despite some bad press, I do not find the show to be overly offensive or blatantly racist with respect to the humour and stereotypes it portrays (although there have been some exceptions). My opinion is that this interpretation comes from the bland, boring, and basic plots which make it appear that way. The cast in general is made up of colourful, diverse and likeable individuals, who on occasion end up making a pleasurable and fun viewing experience. I’m inclined to believe that the sheer number of characters was done to balance out their vague and severely underwritten roles, but hopefully that will result in some on-screen flexibility regarding storylines.

Although the main theme has been the same throughout the show thus far, it does give clear indication that it is making changes based on the criticisms it has received, which it should be commended for as very few shows ever do this (successfully).

            This is the type of show that at the moment is right on the edge. It’s not terrible enough that I can make a firm assertion supporting not watching it, especially since there seem to be very few watchable shows at the moment, but it’s also not polished enough that is can give it a positive recommendation. My final pronouncement: it’s not bad, but it’s also not memorable.
Click to go to top