3.12.11

It's in your TV: American Horror Story

##Before I start the reviewing bit I want to give some explanation for the absence since my last post. I have been working on a few side projects, which initially started out great, but that at the moment have been put in “pending” status. I am hopeful that in the near future they will see the light of day and I will be able to share them with you all; I’ll keep you posted on their progress. (I’m also undertaking a Masters at the moment so that has also been keeping me busy, but I’ll try to post more regularly than before, although the 3 per week you are used to may not still apply).




So, I’ll get straight to it. American Horror Story is a show about a spooky house that does bad things to good people, or was it good things to bad people, or random things to anyone in the vicinity? It’s a bit hard to tell at first, but as the story goes on it becomes a bit clearer (but not by much). The main premise involves a family of three who have recently moved in: Dr. Ben Harmon, an adulterous psychiatrist whose best idea of mending the past issues in his life (i.e. cheating on his wife) is to uproot the whole family and move them to the suburbs – clearly he is awesome at his job, Vivien Harmon the wife… and that’s all you can really say about her at the start, no other qualities or defining characteristics (and later on she is characterised is the stereotype of the betrayed house wife, nothing more), and Violet Harmon the standard moody teenager, misunderstood by society (and her psychiatrist dad who seems oblivious to her distress), who finds solace in Tate, an eerie and morbid teenager who is being treated by her dad. There is also a hot/not hot maid and an even creepier next door neighbour with a tendency to pop by and bring poisoned treats for the family while constantly reminding everyone of how knowledgeable she is of how the world truly is and her cursed womb.

The story at first seems very cliché and unimaginative, but over time starts to branch out into multiple mini-stories, each having one of the main characters at the centre, while still managing to intertwine them quite well when the narrative requires it. I did find the first few episodes unnecessarily convoluted, which may put off some viewers, but if you manage to stick with it, it does improve, especially after some depth is given to the characters.

It should be mentioned that this may be the one of the few shows on TV at the moment that actually does suspense-horror properly (the other being the Walking Dead). It is usually a difficult balance that has to be achieved to make a horror show good; the characters must be interesting and well developed, as they are the ones we need to associate with and whose reactions and experiences make the show entertaining, and the shock, supernatural and gore value must not be exaggerated. Shows that fail at horror usually either focus too much on making the monster, poltergeist, whatever, too scary, or too detailed, or in-your-face that the audience habituates to it, and the story loses out. The other pitfall is over-developing characters, something that you can see on Supernatural, where any semblance of horror, suspense, or narrative seems to take a back seat to the drama of the protagonists’ lives. AHS hasn’t (yet at least) failed in this respect, as the show is now the characters are properly defined and given individual views on the event that are occurring around them, adding layers and depth to the story as a whole. That being said, it seems that when it comes to “giving depth to characters” the writers fail to separate “people” from “ghosts”, and if a ghost starts to be overly developed, any effect it will have on the horror aspect disappears. If a ghost talks, walks, eats, has sex and even (spoiler ->) makes babies, then what is the actual difference between people and dead-people?

The thing that annoyed me are the great differences between how the scenes progress, where sometimes the audience is flooded with information and important plot points, while at others there seems to be no relevance to a scene aside from creating a pause between the “good parts”. It could be argued that this is done intentionally, but the lack of fluidity at times severely affects the immersion process, without achieving any long term advantages.

A little tip that I have for fresh viewers of the show is to not imagine it being about the family and the event that occur to them, and view it more as the story of the house and the things that happened and will happen there. Also, try to ignore the ridiculousness of the maid, especially in scenes where she is in a room with both men and women where she gives the impression of being schizophrenic, shifting between lascivious and noble based on who she is facing.

Overall, the cinematography is well made, there is no overuse of special effects or trickery, and the acting in general is very good. The cast itself has great chemistry, having their interactions appear realistic and fluid. One issue is that they show tends to over-develop individuals that are only around for a short time, or that play minor roles. There are also plenty of references to other horror stories, urban legends, and tragic deaths in real life, some of which are subtle, but most are quite obvious. If you are a fan of horror you may appreciate the “classic” quality of the scare tactics, and the fact that the show does not shy away from brutal and extreme setups (e.g. at one point there is a rape scene with a guy dressed up in S&M-style latex suit), and for regular fans of TV you may find it refreshingly different than other current shows on TV.


Click to go to top